Throughout
this module I have tried to answer the question, “how can I utilize technology to assess students’ progress
and help them assess their own progress as readers and writers?” I mainly
focused on finding tools that could help my students and me assess their writing
progress, and found several that addressed my question in the article “New Wave
in Writing.” After sharing this article with my classmates, I learned that
several of my peers are also interested in finding tools to help students
monitor their progress as writers. Of the resources listed in the article, the ones that offered immediate
feedback to students and progress reports to teachers are Write to Learn by
Pearson, Revision Assistant by Turnitin, and PEG Writing:
·
Write
to Learn scores students’ writing using a variety of rubrics, including a
college and career readiness, ELL, and six traits of high quality writing
(ideas, organization, conventions, sentence fluency, word choice, and voice).
·
Revision
Assistant offers specific feedback on students’ analysis, focus, language, and
evidence in their writing.
·
PEG
Writing provides students with feedback and scores for textual evidence,
content accuracy, and the six traits of high quality writing.
On the surface, all of these tools appear to offer very
similar services, and I need to do more research to determine which one is
best.
One of my peers shared an online resource that I can use to help students
engage in and improve their writing—Storybird. This free tool motivates
students to create digital stories—picture books, chapter books, and poetry—using
artwork as inspiration and allows classmates to give feedback on one another’s
stories. This could be an engaging alternative to the standard academic paper
format for summative assessments, which according to Professor Davidson Of Duke
University, “is a real disincentive to creative but untrained writers.”
When
I looked for a tool for assessing students’ reading progress, I went back to
one of the resources that I discovered during the first module—Biblionasium,
which is similar to Goodreads, but is specifically designed for kids. While further exploring this
site, I discovered a feature that provides teachers with reports of students’
reading for a given time period. On this report page, teachers and students can
see: the books students report they have finished, how much time and the number
of pages they report they have read, the reading level of each book they have
read, and the Lexile range of each book they have read. If students are
entering this information consistently and accurately, this information could
be very useful in monitoring how much students are reading and the level of
books they are reading.
References:
Biblionasium. Retrieved from www.biblionasium.com
Fink, J. (2016).
New WAVE in writing. District Administration, 52(8), 49-51.
PEG Writing.
Retrieved from www.pegwriting.com
Revision
Assistant. Retrieved from ww.turnitin.com/en_us/what-we-offer/revision-assistant
Richtel, M.
(2012, January 20). Blogs vs. term papers. The
New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/22/education/edlife/muscling-in-on-the-term-paper-tradition.html
Write to Learn.
Retrieved from www.writetolearn.net
Thanks for sharing that last resource; Biblionasium. We used to use STAR/AR in my building as a way to track IRL/Lexile and to get students to read. We aren't using that anymore and I'm concerned about how I'm going to get my students to keep reading. I really hate the idea of doing reading logs or required book reports (though I have to with my 6th graders; it's a team decision) as I feel they take the fun out of reading. Reading is a leisure activity for me. I want my students to at least tolerate it if not also think of it as a leisure activity as well. AR gave students some flexibility in books (they had to take a reading comprehension quiz on books they've read, accrue points, then combine to hit a goal by the end of each quarter) and this seems really similar in that sense.
ReplyDelete